SSCI《Journal of Enterprise Information Management》征稿: 生成式人工智能与社会
2025年09月02日
截止日期:2026/03/31 23:59
征稿期刊
Journal of Enterprise Information Management
期刊级别
IF 6.4 (JCR 2024)
SSCI
Q1 (INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE 10/166)
Q1 (MANAGEMENT 57/420)
征稿主题
Generative AI and Society: Organisational and Social Impact, Ethics and Policies
细分领域
Positive and negative impact of GenAI
How does GenAI contribute to societal upgradation? For example, it promotes social welfare, benefits the disabled and ageing population, and drives global healthcare and mobility, among others.
Why is GenAI said to augment human skills? How can it serve as an effective collaborator, advance engineering techniques such as offering automation of knowledge work, enhancing productivity, etc.? What skills are necessary to leverage this technology (Cetindamar et al., 2022)?
Why is there a need to address the sustainability aspect of GenAI? What characteristics of this technology impede sustainability? What can be probable measures to mitigate them? How does it raise serious environmental concerns?
What human issues need to be addressed to ensure that GenAI does not pose a safety concern for the users? For example, how to assess the boundary between authentic and artificial human content? How does technology have a probability of interfering with and manipulating human behaviour or affect human rights such as freedom of speech?
Orgnisational and societal impact of GenAI
Does GenAI present a paradigm in the transformation of both society and organisations, critically examining the change it brings about at the micro level (e.g., individuals), meso level (e.g., organisations and institutions), and macro level (e.g., governments and global systems)? What would be the extent of this transformation and investigating the possibility of the sustainability of this?
How does GenAI affect the norms and values and operational of organisations and society, driving cultural transformation? What can be done to manage this transformation effectively? What can be the possible consequences?
How can seminal (e.g., Innovation Resistance Theory, Disruptive Innovation Theory, Technological Determinism, Digital Divide Theory, among others) and novel theoretical frameworks be used to conceptualize and uncover the foundations of Generative AI driving organizational societal changes?
What is the perspective of different stakeholders in organisations and society towards the impact GenAI is set to make? Which stakeholders will be impacted the most? Should regulations and policies vary by different stakeholders? What needs to be done to equip these stakeholders to manage the organizational and societal changes manifested by the advent of GenAI?
Ethical impact of GenAI
Is GenAI responsible for mirroring the existing societal issues, such as promoting bias and stereotyping? What possible solutions can address these issues?
What are the different ethical concerns the technology poses to society, for example, accounting for threats to fundamental human rights and autonomy, non-discrimination, explainability, transparency, etc.?
In a bid to develop Responsible AI, what different aspects need to be included to manage ethical concerns effectively? For example, it needs to inform the Explainability of GenAI, promote fair and ethical use, etc.
What ethical issues pose a threat to human existence? For example, the rise of semi-humans which can imitate their features to the extent of not realising the boundary between artificial and authentic humans.
Policy and regulatory impact of GenAI
Why do you think there is a need to draft policies or regulatory guidelines/frameworks that can aid in the effective management of GenAI and mitigate the negative effects of this technology on society?
What role does geographical variation play in the development, penetration and impact of GenAI on society? Should policies and regulatory guidelines vary by geographical region? Will a global law/policy/regulation suffice for GenAI?
How should the policies or regulatory guidelines be developed in order to account for stakeholders’ perceptions and needs, fair and ethical use, and strike the optimal balance between negative and positive aspects of GenAI?
How do we conceptualise the policies and regulatory guidelines to ensure fair use of GenAI in society? For example, what different aspects should it include, such as impact assessment, responsible AI, legitimate use of the technology, etc.?
重要时间
Submission Deadline: 31 March 2026
推荐内容
- 广州国际城市创新传播研究中心2018年度课题招标公告
- 辽宁省教育厅办公室关于开展2021年度高等学校基本科研项目(青年项目)遴选工作的通知
- 教育部社科司关于2022年度教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目评审结果的公示
- 2024年江苏民政政策理论研究课题指南通知
- 内蒙古社会科学基金2022年度项目(第二批)申报通知
- 福建省教育科学规划常规课题2024年度申报通知
- 《南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年选题与投稿简则
- 2025年度国家粮食和物资储备局软科学课题申报
- SSCI《International Journal of Operations & Production Management》征稿: 地缘政治紧张与供应链网络设计
- SSCI《European Management Journal》征稿: 公共管理中的价值观
